5320 Northshore Drive,
North Little Rock, Arkansas 72118
contact@sowellmanagement.com
You should receive a confirmation email shortly. Don’t forget to reserve your room through the unique Sowell hotel reservation page. You can extend your stay at the Sowell Summit reduced room rate.
WEEK AHEAD
April 7-11, 2025
Our trend-following technical signals have down-shifted into neutral territory on April 3, weighed down by selling pressure as President Trump’s global tariffs accelerated concerns about a potential recession. As a result, our tactical allocation has been adjusted and rebalanced to a neutral stance (60/40) for the time being.
There aren't enough words to capture the chaos of this week in a finite space. What began as what some dismissed as a poker tactic to bring countries to the negotiating table, President Trump's tariff announcement turned out to be far more than just calling his bluff.
On April 2, President Trump imposed a sweeping 10% global tariff on all countries — and took it a step further. He announced additional individualized reciprocal tariffs aimed specifically at nations with which the U.S. runs trade deficits. Some of those tariffs soared as high as 49%.
The stock market ignored much of the favorable economic fundamentals released:
Instead, it went into full-blown mayhem. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite fell 10% and 11.4% in just two days, respectively. This wasn't just headline fodder — this was real, and it landed hard on the backs of American retirees watching their 401(k)s evaporate in real-time.
There was no safe haven in equities. Fears of a recession — and the inflation that might come with it — surged. Investors fled to safety, crowding into Treasuries. The yield curve tightened sharply, with 10- to 30-year yields falling more than 20 basis points. The Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and Long U.S. Treasuries finished the week up 1.12% and 3.12%, respectively.
Buried in the chaos — and nearly overlooked in the noise — was a critical line from the White House press release:
"These tariffs will remain in effect until such time as President Trump determines that the threat posed by the trade deficit and underlying nonreciprocal treatment is satisfied, resolved or mitigated."
That statement is a moving target. Translation: these tariffs could remain indefinitely or be lifted with a coin toss. The market hates uncertainty — and this, right here, is its kryptonite.
What's crystal clear is that this is just the opening chapter. Front-door and backdoor negotiations are surely underway. But the questions keep mounting: Will countries retaliate? Will they surrender? Will they find alternative tactics, such as currency manipulation — devaluing their own currencies to cheapen exports and make U.S. imports more expensive? Could the U.S. consider devaluing the dollar to close the trade deficit and weaken other countries' economies?
One thing is certain: President Trump is on a short leash. The clock is ticking. If this escalates unchecked, the economy could nosedive. There is more to come, and investors are well advised to keep a long-term perspective. The ride ahead might be rough — but history has shown that patience, not panic, pays.
The S&P 500 broke below its 200-day moving average, but it's not technicals that have investors on edge — it's the what's next tariff drama that's truly unsettling the markets.
While the Fed has no pre-scheduled FOMC meeting in April, markets won't lack signals. This week brings a trifecta of economic tea leaves: the Consumer Price Index (CPI), the Producer Price Index (PPI), and the opening bell of Q1 earnings season, led by the big banks.
On paper, these normally should shape the market's expectations for the Fed's next move on interest rates. In reality? All eyes are likely to be hijacked by the latest headline tied to President Trump's tariff drama. Whether it's a breakthrough deal, a retaliatory threat, or a press conference with more bark than basis points, trade tensions are the elephant on the trading floor seeking relief and clarity.
"Corporations are going to respond to incentives. And you can go all the way back to Adam Smith and the Wealth of Nations and the idea of capitalism. You want people pursuing profit to do that in a way that is also good for the society. Where I think a lot of economists, and this is left and right of center, got it wrong was to think that's just always the case. As long as they're pursuing profit, it's going to be good. And it's going to be good it it's within certain constraints."
— Oren Cass, Chief Economist at American Compass, The Daily Show, April 1, 2025
Digital Zeros and Human Folly: Lessons from Sowell's Investment Cafe with Jason Hsu
On this particular Friday, Jason Hsu's vocal cords were nearly out of commission—laryngitis had him whispering through sentences punctuated by dry wit and half-grins. But his ideas? Loud and clear.
What started as a casual team lunch turned into a masterclass in behavioral finance, macroeconomics, and the future of investing. Hsu, Founder of Rayliant and Chief Economist for East West Bank turned trade wars, inflation, and passive investing into a captivating narrative. Equal parts professor, stand-up comic, and philosopher, he left the room nodding, laughing, and thinking twice about logging into their brokerage accounts.
The Real Power of Doing Nothing
"The best investors?" Hsu began. "They forgot their passwords."
He was dead serious. In fact, data from Schwab and others show the top-performing accounts often belong to those who forgot they had them—literally. No trades, no panic-selling, no rebalancing every time the market hiccupped. Just time in the market.
He compared this to the worst cohort: male doctors. Smart, accomplished, and wildly confident—too confident. "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing," he quipped. These are the investors who think they can beat the market. Spoiler: they rarely do.
Hsu didn't just make it personal; he made it universal. We live in a world that rewards activity. Work more hours, get promoted. Study harder, score higher. But investing flips that logic on its head. "The more you try, the worse you do," he said. "And that's why most people need an advisor: to protect them from themselves."
The Illusion of Control
The most striking metaphor of the day came not from finance but from optics. Hsu pulled up an image of a red Coca-Cola can. Zoom in, pixel by pixel, and there is no red—only black, white, and green dots. The human brain fills in the gaps. It wants to see red, just as it wants to see patterns in stock charts and headlines.
"Behavioral bias isn't a bug. It's the default," he said. The investor's mind sees what it wants to see. Confirmation bias, recency bias, and loss aversion are not just terms from a textbook; they're the invisible hands pushing you to make bad decisions.
And that's where the role of quant investing comes in. Not to replace human advisors but to give them tools to counter human error. Data doesn't lie, Hsu said, but people can certainly lie with data. It takes integrity to wield it wisely.
Tariffs, Trade Deficits, and the Art of De-Escalation
Hsu framed tariffs not as serious economic policy but as strategic tools. "We don't manufacture goods; we manufacture digital zeros," he said. The U.S. exports its currency and imports the world's labor. Other countries send us phones, clothes, and oil. We send them... IOUs.
So when a trade war brews, it's often a tactic to get someone to the negotiating table. "We threaten tariffs not to hurt others, but to bring them to the table. What do they need to buy from the U.S.? How much do they need to invest here to make it go away?"
He noted that this approach shifts global dynamics away from ideological standoffs and into dealmaking. "We no longer say, 'We're democracies, they're not.' We just say: trade deficit, trade deficit."
By treating trade more like business than moral combat, Hsu believes the U.S. is de-escalating the risk of hot wars and focusing instead on transactional compromise. It may rattle markets in the short term, but it might also create paths to long-term stability.
The Two-Option World
One of Hsu's most recurring themes is the fantasy of the third option: high returns, no risk. It doesn't exist.
"You can have high return with high risk, or low return with low risk. That's it. Option three? That's how people lose money."
He tells this to institutional clients and retail investors alike. The difference? Institutions accept the truth. Retail investors want to believe in magic. Advisors, he argued, are in the business of truth-telling. Of helping people avoid the seductive promise of option three.
The Noble Profession
"This work isn't complex," he said. "It's noble."
Advisors don't need to have a crystal ball. What they need is the wisdom to guide clients through uncertainty. That means keeping them from selling at the bottom, reminding them that staying the course beats chasing trends and showing them the value of patience in a world addicted to instant gratification.
As Daryl Seaton put it later, "We don't need to do anything right now. If we did our job right, our clients are already positioned where they should be."
The Rise of AI and the Fall of Mentorship?
Toward the end, the conversation turned to AI. Hsu had strong praise and a quiet warning. AI, he said, is revolutionizing industries from law to medicine. But there's a cost: we're removing the ladder.
Junior lawyers, consultants, and analysts used to learn by doing grunt work. Now, AI does it faster and better. That's great for margins, but it's not so great for mentorship.
"If there's no junior generation learning the ropes, where does the next generation of leaders come from?"
AI, he says, is a phenomenal assistant. But without a human to guide and contextualize, we risk losing the depth that comes from real experience.
Bringing It Home
In the end, what stood out most wasn't the depth of knowledge, though there was plenty. It was the clarity. The ability to distill dizzying complexity into something memorable, something sticky. Like this:
"The fastest way to make a million dollars? Start with two."
Jason Hsu isn't interested in making investing sound easy. He's interested in making it real. For a team of advisors committed to doing right by their clients, it was a timely reminder of both the science and soul of this business.
Or, as Hsu put it: "Everyone wants to get rich fast. But no one wants to get rich slow. The other option? Get poor fast."
Advisory services offered through Sowell Management, a Registered Investment Advisor. The views expressed represent the opinion of Sowell Management. The views are subject to change and are not intended as a forecast or guarantee of future results. This material is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice and is not intended as an endorsement of any specific investment. Stated information is derived from proprietary and non-proprietary sources that have not been independently verified for accuracy or completeness. While Sowell Management believes the information to be accurate and reliable, we do not claim or have responsibility for its completeness, accuracy, or reliability. Statements of future expectations, estimates, projections, and other forward-looking statements are based on available information and Sowell Management’s view as of the time of these statements. Accordingly, such statements are inherently speculative as they are based on assumptions that may involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Actual results, performance or events may differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. Investing in securities involves risks, including the potential loss of principal. While equities may offer the potential for greater long-term growth than most debt securities, they generally have higher volatility. International investments may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuation in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles, or from economic or political instability in other nations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.