1

WEEK AHEAD

Feb 24-28, 2025

Our tactical signals softened last week from heightened short-term volatility and rising uncertainty, but two days of downward pressure are far from a trend. For now, our tactical positioning remains fully allocated, as close monitoring for potential risk of recalibration.

If there's one thing the Trump Trade has taught investors, it's that markets move at the speed of headlines. Volatility isn't just an occasional guest—it's a permanent resident fueled by the President's latest tariff maneuvers. Case in point: the S&P 500 gained +1.52% in the week of February 14, bringing its year-to-date return to +4.11%. Yet, just a week later, it fell -1.63%, trimming its YTD gains to +2.42%. The question isn't whether markets are volatile—they are. The real question is whether economic fundamentals can justify riding out the storm. Let's take a look under the hood.

Markets Push Higher Despite Tariff Turbulence

For much of Trump's current tenure, stocks have remarkably climbed despite geopolitical tremors. Even as the White House floated a 25% tariff on imported steel and aluminum—with reciprocal tariffs under discussion - equities held their ground. Not even a hotter-than-expected inflation print could derail the broader market's resilience.

Inflation: Running Higher Than Forecast

  • Consumer Price Index (CPI): January's headline CPI rose 0.5% MoM (vs. +0.3% est.), marking the sharpest jump since August 2023. On a YoY basis, CPI increased 3.0% (vs. +2.9% est.).
  • Core CPI: Stripped of volatile food and energy prices, core CPI climbed 0.4% MoM (vs. +0.3% est.) and 3.3% YoY (vs. +3.1% est.).
  • Producer Price Index (PPI): A similar trend played out here, with PPI rising 0.4% MoM (vs. +0.3% est.) and 3.5% YoY (vs. +3.2% est.).
  • Core PPI: Matched expectations at +0.3% MoM, but came in 0.3% higher YoY at +3.5%.

Inflation is sticky, but the market is beginning to accept that a quick Fed pivot may not be in the cards.

Consumer Spending: Signs of Softening but not Fatigue?

  • Headline Retail Sales: Dropped -0.9% in January, the biggest decline in nearly two years (vs. +0.1% est.).
  • Redbook same-store sales YoY: +6.3%, suggesting continued strength in consumer spending.
  • Existing Home Sales MoM: -4.9%, a steep drop from the prior month's +2.9%.
  • University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment: Plunged to 65.7 from 74, reflecting consumer unease.

Consumer spending has been the backbone of this economic expansion, these numbers suggest some softening, but not bearish.

State of Manufacturing: A Strong Backbone

  • U.S. Industrial Production rose 0.5% MoM, resulting in a 2% YoY increase -the largest rise since October 2022, signaling robust strength in manufacturing. A resilient industrial sector is indicative of a healthy, growing economy.
  • Manufacturing PMI: Improved to 51.6, indicating expansion in factory activity

At the start of the year, markets baked in expectations of Fed rate cuts happening sooner rather than later. That market assumption is now adjusting for that. Meanwhile, Trump's proposed tax cuts with Republicans maintaining majority control of Congress —including eliminating taxes on tips and Social Security income—remain in play but face a "when, not if" dilemma.

Layer in tariff risks, and it's no surprise that sentiment has turned more cautious. But at its core, the economy remains on solid footing: solid labor market, unemployment is low, industrial production is growing, and inflation—while not cooling—isn't running out of control.

Sowell Management maintained a constructive, quality-focused asset allocation across both equities and bonds, favoring resilience over speculation. In a market where policy shifts can turn on a tweet, Sowell's strategy is built for the long haul.

In the week ahead, investors will continue navigating a landscape shaped by geopolitics while focusing on core economic indicators, including durable goods orders, GDP data, and wholesale inventories. On the corporate front, earnings reports from Berkshire Hathaway, Home Depot, TJX, and Dell will help set the tone as February draws to a close.

"The American process has not always been pretty – our country has forever had many scoundrels and promoters who seek to take advantage of those who mistakenly trust them with their savings. But even with such malfeasance – which remains in full force today – and also much deployment of capital that eventually floundered because of brutal competition or disruptive innovation, the savings of Americans has delivered a quantity and quality of output beyond the dreams of any colonist."

– Warren E. Buffet, Berkshire Hathaway 2024 Annual Report, February 22, 2025

Demographic Shifts: How Aging Economies Impact Emerging Market Asset Prices

Perspective by: Jason Hsu, Founder & CIO at Rayliant Global Advisors / Portfolio Manager for $RAYC, $RAYE, $RAYD, and $RAYJ / East West Bank Chief Economist

Famed French sociologist and philosopher Auguste Comte said that demography is destiny. Indeed, aging demographics are one of the most predictable macro challenges for humanity—the ultimate slow-motion train wreck. The world is getting older. Developed market workers are retiring in ever larger numbers. However, because (1) demography is exceedingly slow-moving, and (2) its impact seems to manifest only in the distant future, investors have been no worse off ignoring this impending crisis.

However, I argue in this article that this much-ignored distant future is upon us. I believe it is high time that we pay attention and plan accordingly. Much has been said about the developed market's aging population and its impact on GDP growth. Slowing growth in developed markets is in part caused by its dwindling workforce. The easy and superficial conclusion would be that EM economies, with their younger population, will drive future global growth; thus, EM would present a wonderful investment opportunity. But let's not leave it there.

In this article, I will delve deeper into an analysis of demography. Specifically, exploring the changing dynamics of trade between developed markets (DM) and emerging markets (EM). The big takeaway: As boomers retire, EM will gain increasing leverage over their older trading partners and extract substantially better terms of trade for their exports. This reverses decades of accepting table scraps, where DM captured much of the trade surplus. This dynamic, coupled with DM's mounting debt from excessive consumption fueled by printed dollars, suggests that EM assets will appreciate significantly relative to DM assets, largely driven by EM currency revaluation.

Prologue: Boomer Retirement Will Drive Substantial Domestic Wage Inflation

As developed economies age, retirees who consume but do not produce goods and services will overwhelm young workers domestically. The deteriorating "potential support ratio" of workers to retirees will escalate domestic labor costs. In this future, labor will likely have to negotiate leverage over retirees with capital, reversing prior decades of near-zero real wage growth. Whereas past economic growth has largely benefited capital, future inflation evens the score for labor. The pendulum always swings back.

Surprisingly, the substantial "financial wealth" accumulated by the boomers will aggravate this inflation. This is simply a matter of supply and demand. Retirees with ample nominal wealth must bid aggressively for services from a depleted labor pool. Inflation, after all, is too much money chasing limited production. In that not-so-distant future, we won't be chanting "bring back manufacturing to America." Instead, DM will beg for cheaper imports and immigration from EM to offset inflation.

Despite the central bank's best efforts, we should not be surprised that wage inflation remains intransigent as boomers retire in droves post-COVID. As boomers' retirement intensifies, we will lean ever more heavily on emerging economies for production. Short of major breakthroughs in automating the human touch (Skynet's T-800 notwithstanding), developed economies must supplement their retiree-dominated population with EM labor. Aging developed markets must preserve their scarce labor force for health care and home services and outsource as much as possible to the younger emerging markets.

In that future, as the untenable potential support ratio falls dangerously below two, developed markets will need to deplete their financial resources for manufactured goods from emerging markets. DM retirees will outbid each other for EM production. However, to make matters worse, they must also bid against the increasingly wealthy EM consumers.

This will lead to a new chapter in the EM/DM relationship. Profit maximization will no longer drive U.S. firms to send jobs to low-cost Asian factories. The shortage of able-bodied workers will drive the next phase of outsourcing. What previously was EM's dependence on DM for employment will slip to become DM's dependence on EM for workers.

The Current State of Affairs Regarding DM and EM Trading

To understand the challenges and opportunities as developed markets march into a new relationship with emerging markets, we must understand the current dynamics between DM and EM. Over the past 40 years, EM depended on DM for technology transfer, financial capital, and job creation. In return, DM has received low-cost imports and freed up its workforce for higher value-added creative work. Over the next 20 years, aging developed markets will lean on emerging markets for their younger and more plentiful workforce, giving EM newfound bargaining power. The shift in power will also meaningfully shift the relative valuation of assets.

As mentioned before, there will be significant inflation in developed markets driven by wages. We have already begun to witness some of this in recent years. Using a different frame, wage inflation can be seen as the erosion of DM currency's ability to "purchase" labor hours.  This, as I will expound further below, will lead to a meaningful depreciation of DM currency against EM assets and labor supply.

Now, before we delve deeper, let me share that this article will primarily focus on the relationship between the export-oriented EM Asian economies and the consumption-driven economies of the developed West. However, in a future edition of The Bridge, I will also explore what the future holds for the resourced-based EM economies.

The Distant Past: The Emergence of EM Asia Through "Learning and Earning from Exporting"

Over the last four decades, DM economies were firmly in control of a lopsided, albeit co-dependent, relationship with EM Asia. Emerging economies badly need technology transfer, training, management skills, infrastructure, and financial capital. Low-cost labor was EM's only "real" currency to exchange for the abovementioned list of critical ingredients for development and growth. EM's own fiat currencies were of little international value, as they were backed by few valuable assets and plagued by economic and political instability.

What some DM apologists might call the "exploitation of EM workers" was indeed what I believe to be the West driving very hard bargains with their EM counterparts, recognizing their superior negotiating position. To be fair, as harsh as the terms of trade might have been in retrospect, EM economies craved these outsourcing opportunities. Yes, the decades of EM laborers working long and hard factory hours for cheap did benefit DM firms and consumers substantially. However, it also brought tremendous knowledge, capital, and other critical ingredients to help many Asian economies escape poverty and build global competitiveness. This is analogous to a new graduate taking on a low starting salary working an 80-hour week, outworking higher-paid senior professionals to build human capital for a better future.

The Present: DM Consumers Spend to Celebrate Life as EM Asia Workers Max Out Overtime

Over time, the skill level of EM Asia's workers, and consequently the quality of their export products, have improved significantly. This is the famed "learning by doing." Some in the West complain about Asians ripping off Western intellectual property—be it design concepts, technology, management, or operational know-how. Frankly, when smart, hardworking young people work for or with exceptional experts, these eager professionals learn, adapt, and innovate. This is true of the great entrepreneurs of Silicon Valley, who are also often referred to as pirates by the larger incumbent firms they displace; this is certainly true of savvy Asian entrepreneurs.

Present-day EM Asia (Taiwan, South Korea, Mainland China) is dominated by manufacturers who have evolved significantly beyond providing cheap outsourcing. Many have become world-leading producers of high-value hardware—Samsung, TSMC, and Foxconn, to name a few. However, despite their manufacturing leadership, EM Asia continues to pursue aggressive exporting to DM, often still on low margins despite the high value-add. They compete fiercely against each other and against themselves to earn dollars and accumulate financial capital. Luckily for DM consumers and firms, there is still a great excess of highly skilled workers in Asia willing to work unhealthy hours to save for retirement.

Of course, the flip side of EM Asia's export is DM's overconsumption, leading to ever larger trade deficits and mounting national debt. In short, EM workers grind out long factory hours for DM consumers; EM households gain wealth in the process, while DM households spend down their financial assets in a gradual global convergence of wealth.

However, there is no need to be judgmental about the excessive consumerism of the West. The terms of trade (cheap export prices) offered by the East are simply too attractive, and the West has built so much wealth from its head start in technological innovation and adoption. Living it up is rational and frankly good for all—the global south sure loves the business! The risk is, of course, with the West living too large for too long, ultimately having parties on borrowed money; that unwinding could be chaotic, which brings us to an analysis of what the future might hold as we all get much older.

The Future State: What Aging Demographics Could Mean for the DM/EM Trade Relationship

As developed markets consume more goods produced through outsourcing and financed through newly printed money, the gap between their consumption and production could widen dangerously. That gap measures DM's dependence on EM manufacturing to contain inflation and maintain its current standard of living. It is useful to understand that we cannot all have more work–life balance; someone has to do the work. If we all shift toward more life and less work, life becomes  expensive quickly. The fact that the West gets to pursue more life away from work is financed by the East embracing the dismal belief that life is hard work.

However, as developed markets move into their boomer retirement phase, the lack of domestic production, excessive monetary wealth, and debt creation driven by quantitative easing make DM fiat currencies appear vulnerable. As DM professionals retire, their companies run low on workers, manufacturing experience, and capacity. As DM savers further spend, they exhaust their hard assets. It begs the question: what future real cash flows and assets might back DM currencies or support the value of their debt and equity shares? Publicly, Powell, Musk, and Dalio question the $32 trillion U.S. debt and the risk it imposes on the U.S. dollar. Privately, EM business owners and governments similarly question their long-standing faith in the almighty dollar.

DM's aging demographics and deteriorating balance sheets chip away at their greatest asset—strong and highly desirable currencies. It is widely believed by economists and central bankers that the exorbitant privilege of the U.S. dollar has been an enormous contributor to American prosperity. The Nixon government famously said, "The dollar is our currency, but your problem." This succinctly summarizes the predicament of EM, where factory owners send billions in manufactured goods in exchange for dollars that the U.S. government prints at will. This is why, today, BRIC+ countries are working aggressively to create credible trade and reserve currency alternatives away from DM currencies.

Chipping away from the other direction is EM's inevitable rise in wealth. As EM workers accumulate wealth, their desire (or certainly their children's desire) to consume the fruits of their labor increases. Equally, the desire for work-life balance will reduce the willingness to grind out 14-hour days at a factory. Taken together, it's likely that EM workers will be less interested in working for DM consumers in exchange for fiat currencies with poor fundamentals and high inflation risk.

Of course, pundits are fond of pointing out EM's own deteriorating demographics, arguing that EM Asian economies like South Korea, Taiwan, and Mainland China are also aging rapidly and thus will suffer as much, if not more, than their DM counterparts. However, with deeper reflection, it should not surprise anyone that aging EM will hurt DM far more.

Today, EM Asia is defined by overworking, over-saving, and under-consuming, while developed markets are the mirror opposite. Aging EM means they will work less and consume more, resulting in far less exporting and far more expensive export prices. That means aging DMs must consume significantly less than they currently do. The pain falls disproportionally on DM as EM also ages. EM's shrinking trade with DM will not be driven by DM taking away work opportunities but by EM's unwillingness to work cheaply for DM. For savvy investors, it is important to understand this shifting reality. The Western-centric narrative that the global north provides jobs to EM youth will no longer hold true. Instead, the new story will be the global south caring for DM retirees.

Conclusion

Boomer retirement has global macro implications. It could meaningfully shift the balance of power toward labor, away from capital, toward EM, and away from DM. Domestically, inflation will be the moderating mechanism—high inflation will transfer real wealth from boomers to the next generation, who didn't have the good fortune of participating in the golden era of explosive growth and wealth creation. Internationally, currency will play the role of redistribution from the aging DM to the younger EM. I believe these asset pricing dynamics are simply necessary in equilibrium to ensure that the great abundance of DM nominal wealth and their printed fiat currency cannot overconsume the dwindling global labor pool as the world ages. This answers one of our generation's most puzzling economic questions: how does the $32 trillion worth of U.S. government debt matter if the principal never has to be paid?  Soon enough, people who do the work will stop wanting to let you party on their dime. Put another way, EM workers will not want to hold DM debt (currency)…and perhaps neither should you.

Disclosures

This article contains opinions subject to change without prior notice. This is not a recommendation to purchase or sell any securities discussed herein. The securities identified and described do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for client accounts. The reader should not assume that an investment in the securities identified was or will be profitable.  This article was written by Jason Hsu, a portfolio manager at Rayliant Global Advisors, as an opinion piece, and the opinions herein are those of Jason and not Rayliant Global Advisors.

Advisory services offered through Sowell Management, a Registered Investment Advisor. The views expressed represent the opinion of Sowell Management. The views are subject to change and are not intended as a forecast or guarantee of future results. This material is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice and is not intended as an endorsement of any specific investment. Stated information is derived from proprietary and non-proprietary sources that have not been independently verified for accuracy or completeness. While Sowell Management believes the information to be accurate and reliable, we do not claim or have responsibility for its completeness, accuracy, or reliability. Statements of future expectations, estimates, projections, and other forward-looking statements are based on available information and Sowell Management’s view as of the time of these statements. Accordingly, such statements are inherently speculative as they are based on assumptions that may involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Actual results, performance or events may differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. Investing in securities involves risks, including the potential loss of principal. While equities may offer the potential for greater long-term growth than most debt securities, they generally have higher volatility. International investments may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuation in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles, or from economic or political instability in other nations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

 

Sign up for the Week Ahead Market Commentary

Download the Journey Roadmap

Download the Journey Roadmap

Sign up for the
Sowell Summit Event

(Please be sure to click the link on the web page to book your room)

Thank you for registering!

You should receive a confirmation email shortly. Don’t forget to reserve your room through the unique Sowell hotel reservation page. You can extend your stay at the Sowell Summit reduced room rate.